Tires are the only thing between your car and the road, which means you NEED them to be reliable for good handling, quick acceleration, and solid braking. You can’t afford to mess around with bad tires.

In this article, we’re calling out the tire brands that aren’t worth your hard-earned cash and could put your safety at risk. These are 20 tire brands we’d never waste money on:


By Cjp24 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,

Triangle tires, originating from China, have garnered a reputation for poor performance, particularly in terms of grip. Reviewers often describe these tires as having low grip, with tendencies to squeal under moderate acceleration in dry conditions and being dangerously slippery in wet conditions.

Despite being relatively young in the tire industry since 1976, Triangle has faced criticism for the quality of its products. Although the company has aimed to enhance its research and development, particularly through partnerships like the one with the University of Akron in 2011, customers continue to report inadequate traction, especially in wet conditions, raising safety concerns.


By GT1976 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,

Goodride, another Chinese tire brand under the Zhongce Rubber Group, has been in the market since 1997 and faces similar criticisms. These tires are noted for their unbalanced handling and poor ride quality, with a consistent lack of grip across various weather conditions. Customer reviews frequently label them as “cheap” and “crappy,” reflecting widespread dissatisfaction.

While Goodride offers a broad range of tires, including those for commercial vehicles, their competitive pricing does not compensate for the subpar performance. Although durability isn’t a major issue, the brand’s traction and handling capabilities are inferior compared to other budget-friendly options.


Shutter2U of Canva Pro

Geostar tires, associated with Nankang and produced in China and Taiwan, are known for their uncomfortable ride and inadequate performance, especially in wet and snowy conditions. These tires often struggle with grip, particularly during turns, posing a safety risk.

Geostar represents a lower-tier option within the Nankang brand, emphasizing affordability over quality, which translates to compromised safety and performance.


welcomia of Canva Pro

Autogreen tires, originating from China, are characterized by significant shortcomings in durability and performance. They exhibit poor grip on dry surfaces, which deteriorates further on wet roads, leading to unsafe driving conditions.

Complaints about uneven wear and rapid deterioration are common, with reports of the tires becoming bald in as little as six months or not lasting beyond 20,000 miles. Given the average annual mileage of an American driver, these tires often fail to provide even a year of service, raising serious concerns about their longevity and overall value for consumers.


dangrytsku from Getty Images/ Canva Pro

Chaoyang, established in 1958 in Hangzhou, China, has expanded its product range over the years from bicycles to cars and industrial vehicles. As part of the Zhongce Rubber Group, Chaoyang has a history in the tire industry, particularly with bicycle tires, where it gained a positive reputation.

However, its venture into car tires has not been as successful. Users often report issues with noise, rapid wear, and poor performance in various weather conditions. The transition from bicycle to car tires seems to have exposed a gap in quality and performance, indicating a need for further development in their automotive tire sector.


Andrii Biletskyi from Bilanol/ Canva Pro

Gladiator tires, known for their affordability, have faced criticism for their lack of quality and performance. Consumers report quick tread wear, inadequate grip in wet and icy conditions, and frequent sidewall failures.

The brand’s struggle to balance cost with quality has resulted in a product that many find unsatisfactory for long-term use.


By Cjp24 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,

Accelera tires are often criticized for their lack of durability and performance, especially in challenging conditions. Users frequently encounter problems like quick tread wear, poor wet traction, and sidewall damage, such as bulges or cracks.

Although these tires are priced lower, their potential for early replacement undermines the initial savings. The issues with Accelera tires point towards a compromise in quality that can affect overall driving safety and cost-effectiveness.


photo_Pawel from Getty Images/ Canva Pro

Ohtsu tires, while economically priced, are noted for their inadequate performance and durability. Common complaints include uneven tread wear, insufficient traction in wet or snowy conditions, and a propensity for sidewall defects.

These issues raise concerns about the tires’ safety and overall value, as their lower upfront cost may be offset by the need for more frequent replacements and the potential for increased maintenance expenses.


olaser from Getty Images Signature/ Canva Pro

Delinte tires are known for their competitive pricing but have received varied feedback regarding their quality and performance. Common concerns include uneven tread wear, diminished wet surface traction, and susceptibility to sidewall damage.

Despite their affordability, the inconsistency in performance and durability raises questions about their value, leading many consumers to consider other options.


Gustavo Fring from Pexels/ Canva Pro

Antares tires are often criticized for their inadequate tread life and performance, particularly in adverse driving conditions. Users commonly report rapid wear, poor traction in wet or slippery situations, and frequent sidewall issues.

Although these tires might seem cost-effective at first, their compromised durability and performance can lead to higher overall costs and potential safety concerns.


grapix/ Canva Pro

Milestar tires, while affordable, have faced criticism for their inconsistent quality and reduced durability. Reports of sidewall breakdowns, quick tread wear, and unreliable traction across different driving scenarios are common among users.

These issues not only affect the tire’s longevity but also raise safety concerns on the road.


Markus Mainka from MarekPhoto’s Images

Sunny tires are known for their affordability but have been regularly pointed out for poor performance and durability. Consumers frequently mention problems like uneven tread wear, inadequate grip in wet conditions, and susceptibility to sidewall damage.

Although initially cost-effective, the long-term reliability and effectiveness of Sunny tires are questioned due to these performance and durability issues. As a result, they may not be the optimal choice for drivers seeking a balance between cost-efficiency and consistent, safe tire performance.


Markus Mainka from MarekPhoto’s Images/ Canva Pro

Federal tires are often scrutinized for their varying quality and less-than-optimal performance, especially in diverse driving conditions. Common complaints from users include uneven tread wear, inadequate wet surface traction, and sidewall weaknesses.

These issues indicate that Federal tires might not withstand everyday driving demands, leading to early wear and the necessity for more frequent replacements.


Milan Krasula from Getty Images/ Canva Pro

Starfire tires are recognized for their affordability but criticized for their limited tread life and vulnerability to damage. Consumer feedback frequently highlights rapid tread wear, sidewall deformities, and insufficient grip in wet or snowy environments.

Despite the appealing initial price, the decreased longevity and performance issues of Starfire tires question their overall cost-effectiveness. Such drawbacks suggest that these tires might not be the most suitable choice for drivers who value enduring performance and reliability, even with the allure of upfront savings.


Jupiterimages from Photo Images/ Canva Pro

Hercules tires are noted for their affordability, yet they frequently encounter problems such as sidewall issues, uneven wear, and fast tread depletion. Reports from drivers suggest these tires deteriorate quicker than anticipated, necessitating regular replacements and elevating overall costs.

Although initially appealing for their low price, the likelihood of early failure diminishes the appeal of Hercules tires for those seeking dependable, long-term performance, leading to potential increases in expenditure and concerns over tire reliability.


ภาพของFluky Fluky/ Canva Pro

Primewell tires, while economically priced, often fall short in performance and longevity. Users have voiced concerns over quick tread deterioration, reduced wet weather traction, and sidewall defects.

Although attractive for those on a tight budget, the inferior quality of Primewell tires may lead to safety risks and higher long-term maintenance expenses.


By GT1976 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,

Nankang tires face scrutiny due to their uneven wear, limited traction, and higher risk of punctures. Consumers often highlight the short lifespan of these tires, noting they wear out quicker than anticipated.

Their performance in wet or slippery conditions has raised also concerns, as they fail to provide sufficient grip, enhancing the risk during driving.


toa55 from akaratwimages/ Canva Pro

Linglong tires are notorious for their variable quality control, leading to issues like sidewall expansions, accelerated tread wear, and generally poor performance. Reports of these tires failing unexpectedly or undergoing blowouts have surfaced, indicating potential road safety hazards.

The inconsistency in Linglong’s tire quality undermines their dependability and endurance, causing drivers to question the value and safety of investing in these tires for their vehicles.


Stefan Malloch from Getty Images/ Canva Pro

Westlake tires are often noted for their inadequate tread life and vulnerability to sidewall damage. Reports frequently mention early wear and uneven tread patterns, alongside difficulties in achieving reliable traction in wet conditions.

Although these tires may appear economical at first glance, the hidden costs of early replacement tend to negate the upfront savings. This has led to a perception that Westlake tires may not provide the best value over time.


Michael Rolands from Getty Images/ Canva Pro

Douglas tires, typically seen on budget-friendly vehicles, have garnered criticism for their substandard performance and short lifespan. Common complaints include rapid wear, sidewall fractures, and a quick loss of traction.

While initially appealing due to their low cost, the overall performance and durability issues associated with Douglas tires often lead to increased long-term expenses and frequent replacements.

More From RideRambler – What You Need To Know About Michelin’s New Airless Tires (With Pictures)


What You Need To Know About Michelin’s New Airless Tires (With Pictures)

More From RideRambler – 15 Reasons The New Chevy 70/SS Chevelle Deserves A Spot In Your Garage

Image Credit: TransAm Worldwide

15 Reasons The New Chevy 70/SS Chevelle Deserves A Spot In Your Garage

More From RideRambler – 25 SUVs We Don’t Encourage You To Buy

Image Credit: Kevauto, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

25 SUVs We Don’t Encourage You To Buy

Author: Abbie Clark

Title: Co-Founder

Expertise: Automotive Industry, Electric Vehicles, DIY Car Repairs


Abbie Clark is a writer, blog, and founder of RideRambler, Hey She Thrives, and The Bearded Bunch.

From clever car cleaning tricks to the freshest car features and reviews, Abbie loves sharing her knowledge on everything automotive. Outside of her time writing for her websites, you’ll find her fishing with her husband, deciphering her toddler’s babbling, or baking up something sweet.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.